![]() ![]() ![]() The first two viewpoints depend solely on a person's political leanings, but the third was an indisputable fact. And to the employees at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, he was inmate number 9653. ![]() To others, he was a dangerous traitor who sought to discredit the nation’s war effort and undo the tremendous progress the country’s economy had made in the beginning of the 20th century. For some, he was a visionary union leader and politician who rose to the national stage to unite American workers under the banner of socialism. Pardon Attorney lauded the government’s war against dissidents as a success: “It’s exceedingly fortunate that the government has kept a sufficient number of them in prison to set an example of firmness that will go down in history as a warning to those who in the future might be inclined to harbinger and harass the government.” However, the true legacy of the laws, as a means to suppress dissent, set a precedent for the 1950s anti-communist witch hunts and the subsequent attempts to discredit grass-roots movements for peace, civil rights, and women’s rights.By 1920, the name Eugene Debs represented different things to different groups. Not until 1923 did the federal government finally conclude that the original aims behind the prosecution of persons under the Espionage and Sedition acts had been achieved. Attorney became ‘an angel’ of life and death clothed with the power to walk up and down his district, saying, ‘This one will I spare, and that one will I smite.’”Īfter the war, the Supreme Court was reluctant to overturn the two war-era acts nor did it overrule the majority of the convictions made during the war, despite petitions to do so. Reflecting his intent, many federal attorneys and federal district judges seemed determined to surpass each other in their aggressive enforcement of these acts. On May 16, 1918, the Sedition Act was passed, which allowed for the prosecution of “any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the uniform of the Army or Navy,” or any language that might bring those institutions “into contempt, scorn, contumely, or disrepute.” The Attorney General’s official justification for the Sedition Act was to prevent “the quick-tempered vigilantism of the loyal citizenry.” However, his reluctance to prosecute mob vigilantism and his eagerness to subvert free speech reveal his true motive to squelch dissent. When a federal judge acquitted a man who called the President “a Wall Street tool” (arguing that the statement, however distasteful, did not directly obstruct the army, the navy, or the enlistment of soldiers), the Attorney General called for the amendment of the Espionage Act. attorneys, who commented on “how little evidence” was needed “to connect most” of the persons convicted under the Espionage Act “with any direct evidence of substantial violation of that act.” The Attorney General made sure that the act was constructed in the broadest sense, significantly reducing the burden of proof for local U.S. ![]() The Espionage Act, introduced on June 5, 1917, made punishable any acts aimed at obstructing military operations or enlistment to the armed services. He proposed the introduction of two bills, the Espionage and Sedition acts, which enabled his department to take legal action against dissidents. Toward this end, in a 1918 report, Attorney General Thomas Gregory pointed out that the Department of Justice currently had very limited legal power to stand up against conspiracy and propaganda. Despite posing as an ardent supporter of free speech, Wilson, therefore, was intent on silencing the voices of dissent. President Wilson knew that a successful entry to the war depended on unanimous support from the home front. entered the war, anti-war sentiment and pacifist movements were active across the country. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |